Staff Reporter :The Indian Rajya Sabha on Monday cleared the Land Boundary Agreement Bill again correcting an error in the name of the act.India’s External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj tabled the amended bill. None opposed it. But expressing frustration, Leader of Opposition Ghulam Nabi Azad said the minor error has caused an ’embarrassment to the house’.Earlier on Wednesday, the Constitution (119th Amendment) Bill, 2013 was passed by the Rajya Sabha. But there was an error.The error was in the numbering of the bill as “119th” amendment in the title, while it had become “100th” amendment when it was passed. Numbering of constitutional bills is adhoc and change as not all bills introduced are passed.In the upper house, the change was made in the title of the bill, but in the text of the bill changes were not made, according to the India media.However, when it went to the Lok Sabha, a minor mistake in the numbering of the bill, which becomes the Constitution (100th Amendment) Act, 2015, was noticed and corrected, and the bill was then passed.In an explanation in the footnotes of the list of business of the Rajya Sabha, Sushma Swaraj yesterday said, “The bill was passed by the Rajya Sabha at its sitting held on May 6, 2015 and transmitted to Lok Sabha for concurrence. The Lok Sabha at its sitting held on May 7, 2015 passed the Bill with amendments to Clause 3 of the bill,” said. “This was very important bill, but this has caused great embarrassment to entire house… I am not saying the minister is to be blamed for it, officers looking at the bill should go word by word and line by line so in future a bill like this should not be dealt the way it has been dealt,” Azad said.Communist Party of India (Marxist) leader Sitaram Yechury said he had pointed out the error on the day the bill was passed. “I was reminding you from here which amendment it is… listen to us sometimes,” Yechury said.Sushma Swaraj, however, said: “The 119th amendment was presented in 2013, we had amended title when we presented the bill in Rajya Sabha, but we were told rest would be consequential amendment so we did not move them… but Lok Sabha wanted it to be amended everywhere in the bill.”
