Papul’s wife challenge cancellation of his JS membership

block

Staff Reporter :
A writ petition has been filed with the High Court challenging the decision of the parliament secretariat cancelling the parliament membership of Mohammad Shahid Islam Papul commonly known as Kazi Papul who was an independent lawmaker from Laxmipur-2 constituency on grounds of moral turpitude.
The writ petition filed by Papul’s sister Nurunnahar Begum and another one also challenged the legality of the notification that declared the Laxmipur-2 constituency as vacant.
After holding hearing on
the petition the HC bench of Justice Md Mozibur Rahman Miah and Justice Md Kamrul Hossain Mollah fixed today (Tuesday) to pass order on it, said deputy attorney general Nawroz Md Russel Chwodhury who represented the state in the hearing.
The seat of independent lawmaker Kazi Papul was vacated on February 22 this year on grounds of moral turpitude. The parliament secretariat issued a gazette notification to this end following a meeting between Speaker Shirin Sharmin and top officials of the secretariat.
The gazette has been in effect from January 28, 2021, the day Kazi Papul, lawmaker from Laxmipur-2, was sentenced to four years of rigorous imprisonment by a Kuwaiti court for human trafficking and bribing Kuwaiti officials.
Barrister Rokanuddin Mahmud and Barrister Mustafizur Rahman Khan appeared in the court on behalf of Kazi Papul.
Papul was arrested in Kuwait on 6 June last year on charges of human trafficking and money laundering. He later admitted to being engaged in these activities, and also acknowledged involvement in illegal visa trading and bribery of Kuwaiti officials. Following the allegation a Kuwaiti court on January 28 this year sentenced Papul and four others to four years in jail in the case.
In the gazette regarding Papul’s vacated seat, it was mentioned that, as per articles 66 and 67 of the constitution, a member of parliament shall vacate their seat if they are convicted of a criminal offence involving moral turpitude “by a competent court” and is sentenced to imprisonment for not less than two years, unless a period of five years has elapsed since his release.

block