The New York Times :
Ukrainian officials sharply criticised the Biden administration Friday for its ominous warnings of an imminent Russian attack, saying they had needlessly spread alarm, even as a new Pentagon assessment said Russia was now positioned to go beyond a limited incursion and invade all of Ukraine.
The diverging viewpoints brought into the open the stark disagreement between Ukraine and its key partner over how to assess the threat posed by Russia, which has massed about 130,000 troops on Ukraine’s border in what US officials are calling a grave threat to global peace and stability.
The tensions, which have simmered in the background for weeks, have surfaced at a particularly delicate moment, as President Vladimir Putin of Russia reviews the US response to his demands for addressing Russian security concerns in Eastern Europe.
“They keep supporting this theme, this topic,” President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of Ukraine said of the repeated warnings by US officials. “And they make it as acute and burning as possible. In my opinion, this is a mistake.”
Zelenskyy voiced his displeasure just hours before top US military officials issued another dire appraisal of Ukraine’s predicament, saying that Russia has deployed sufficient troops and military hardware to invade all of Ukraine, far
beyond a limited incursion into only the border regions.
“I think you’d have to go back quite a while to the Cold War days to see something of this magnitude,” Gen. Mark Milley, chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said at a news conference at the Pentagon.
Prospects for a negotiated end to the crisis remained uncertain at best Friday. After a videoconference between Putin and President Emmanuel Macron of France, the Kremlin said in a statement that “the principal concerns of Russia went unaddressed” in the US response, even as Macron advocated a conciliatory approach to achieve a diplomatic solution.
Moscow has threatened a “military-technical response” should its concerns not be met.
Behind the scenes, the US is planning to impose severe sanctions on some of the largest state banks and financial institutions in Russia – penalties that the United States says would far exceed previous Western sanctions.
As they have done throughout the crisis, Russian officials sent mixed messages about the state of negotiations with the West. Russia’s foreign minister, Sergey Lavrov, said in a radio interview that Washington’s written response this week contained “a kernel of rationality” on some matters.
Those include missile deployments and military exercises in Eastern Europe, although Lavrov also said that neither the United States nor NATO was seriously addressing the most pressing Kremlin concerns. Russia has demanded that the West scale back its military presence in Eastern Europe to early post-Cold War levels and guarantee that Ukraine never join NATO.
A glimmer of hope came in the form of European-led negotiations this week along a separate diplomatic track, known as the Normandy Format, a grouping that includes France, Germany, Ukraine and Russia. Its meetings centre on the cease-fire agreement that the countries brokered in eastern Ukraine in 2015 but also offer a path to a broader settlement.
After Putin and Macron spoke Friday, a senior official in the French presidency said the two leaders had agreed that their countries should pursue talks through that group. The countries will continue discussions in two weeks in Berlin.
Macron and Putin agreed on the need for continued dialogue and “de-escalation,” and Putin said he had “no offensive plans” in eastern Ukraine, according to the French presidency.
As the West awaited Putin’s next step, Ukrainian officials expressed increasing annoyance with the Biden administration as they stepped up their calls for calm.
Speaking just a day after a phone call with President Joe Biden, Mr Zelenskyy said that while he, too, saw grave risk in the Russian buildup, the US policy of publicising intelligence and risk assessments around the Russian threat was unnerving Ukrainians and harming the economy at a time when he said he would like to see “quiet military preparation and quiet diplomacy.”
“There is military support, financial support, we are grateful for the support,” Zelenskyy said at a news conference for foreign media, according to a Ukrainian government translation. “But I cannot be like other politicians who are grateful to the United States just for being the United States.”
His complaints were echoed by his top security official, Oleksii Danilov, who said that “panic is the sister of failure.””That’s why we are saying to our partners, ‘Don’t shout so much,'” he said. “Do you see a threat? Give us 10 jets every day. Not one, 10. And the threat will disappear.” It is not clear what the long-term ramifications of the rift might be. It is unlikely that Zelenksyy’s statements would have any effect on arms shipments or diplomacy as the West tries to deter Putin from military action. But further divergence between the two countries could induce Ukraine to pursue a separate path to a settlement, one that it has been exploring in the European-led talks underway now. It could also sow distrust that Putin could try to exploit.
Last fall, it was the United States that first raised the alarm about the growing Russian troop presence on the border with Ukraine, and since then Zelenskyy’s government has often appeared reluctant to fully embrace the Biden administration’s sense of urgency.
