Lyndal Rowlands :
With less than half the world’s population online, radio continues to be world’s most widely accessible source of news and information.
For many of the 5 billion people who have access to a radio – it is also a form of social media – with talk radio giving people a chance to participate live on-air.
Martin Scott, Lecturer in Media and International Development at the University of East Anglia told IPS that this social aspect of radio is often over-looked.
“You can have ongoing live discussion on (the radio),” says Scott. “In a newspaper that’s far more difficult, it’s easier to be participatory on radio.”
Scott says that there are many advantages to having live discussions on the air.
“If you want the decision making to be transparent, if you want multiple perspectives to be taken account of, if you want the disadvantaged to be actively helped, engaged in the process, then participatory communication is vital to achieving those things and radio is a medium that often but not always lends itself to doing those things,” he said.
In recent years, the race to get as many people online as possible, has obscured the vital role that the radio continues to play for billions of people, particularly in developing countries.
In fact, some 75 per cent of households in developing countries have access to a radio compared to just 40 per cent, which have access to the internet, according to figures from the UN’s International Telecommunications Union and UNESCO.
As Scott points out radio’s are cheap and have no ongoing running costs, unlike the internet. But there’s more reason why radio is more widely accessible than the internet, especially for people who are disadvantaged. Radio can be broadcast in many different dialects; it is a source of information for the one billion people worldwide who are illiterate, as well as for people who are visually impaired. It can also reach people living in remote areas where even mobile internet is not yet available.
The sharp rise in mobile phone ownership in developing countries has not only led more people to get online, it has also resulted in more people having access to radios, since mobile phones sold in developing countries often come with in-built radios.
Meanwhile, as Scott points out, the World Wide Web does not necessarily signal the death of radio, as many people now listen to radio shows and podcasts online.
And while the internet has led to a significant expansion in who can publish and share news – Scott noted that it shouldn’t necessarily be presumed that the internet is more widely accessible than radio.
Not everybody has the time, literacy, mobile phones or electricity needed to be on Twitter he said, whereas a radio can simply be powered with batteries or even wound-up by hand.
However ensuring that both radio and the internet remain open to as many people as possible means that it is also important to pay attention to how these mediums are governed, says Scott.
“Facebook.org protests on the streets in India and Egypt rightly or wrongly illustrate that governance of new technologies is crucial,” said Scott, referring to protests over a plan to bring affordable internet to developing countries based on access to only a limited number of websites. The plan has been described as a ‘walled garden’ and is considered to go against the principles of the founders of the World Wide Web, who wished for it to remain open.
Historically the number of radio channels has often been restricted by the frequencies and licenses available to go with them. However, while digital radio offers the opportunity to expand the number of radio stations, Scott also cautions that the transition from am/fm to digital should be carefully managed.
Radio NZ recently reported that thousands of people living in the Solomon Islands lost access to radio at the end of January when the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) switched off its AM signal, in favour of FM and online services.
Ruth Liloqula, told Radio NZ that after a recent earthquake some people living in remote parts of the Solomon Islands only knew that there was no tsunami because they heard it on ABC radio.
With less than half the world’s population online, radio continues to be world’s most widely accessible source of news and information.
For many of the 5 billion people who have access to a radio – it is also a form of social media – with talk radio giving people a chance to participate live on-air.
Martin Scott, Lecturer in Media and International Development at the University of East Anglia told IPS that this social aspect of radio is often over-looked.
“You can have ongoing live discussion on (the radio),” says Scott. “In a newspaper that’s far more difficult, it’s easier to be participatory on radio.”
Scott says that there are many advantages to having live discussions on the air.
“If you want the decision making to be transparent, if you want multiple perspectives to be taken account of, if you want the disadvantaged to be actively helped, engaged in the process, then participatory communication is vital to achieving those things and radio is a medium that often but not always lends itself to doing those things,” he said.
In recent years, the race to get as many people online as possible, has obscured the vital role that the radio continues to play for billions of people, particularly in developing countries.
In fact, some 75 per cent of households in developing countries have access to a radio compared to just 40 per cent, which have access to the internet, according to figures from the UN’s International Telecommunications Union and UNESCO.
As Scott points out radio’s are cheap and have no ongoing running costs, unlike the internet. But there’s more reason why radio is more widely accessible than the internet, especially for people who are disadvantaged. Radio can be broadcast in many different dialects; it is a source of information for the one billion people worldwide who are illiterate, as well as for people who are visually impaired. It can also reach people living in remote areas where even mobile internet is not yet available.
The sharp rise in mobile phone ownership in developing countries has not only led more people to get online, it has also resulted in more people having access to radios, since mobile phones sold in developing countries often come with in-built radios.
Meanwhile, as Scott points out, the World Wide Web does not necessarily signal the death of radio, as many people now listen to radio shows and podcasts online.
And while the internet has led to a significant expansion in who can publish and share news – Scott noted that it shouldn’t necessarily be presumed that the internet is more widely accessible than radio.
Not everybody has the time, literacy, mobile phones or electricity needed to be on Twitter he said, whereas a radio can simply be powered with batteries or even wound-up by hand.
However ensuring that both radio and the internet remain open to as many people as possible means that it is also important to pay attention to how these mediums are governed, says Scott.
“Facebook.org protests on the streets in India and Egypt rightly or wrongly illustrate that governance of new technologies is crucial,” said Scott, referring to protests over a plan to bring affordable internet to developing countries based on access to only a limited number of websites. The plan has been described as a ‘walled garden’ and is considered to go against the principles of the founders of the World Wide Web, who wished for it to remain open.
Historically the number of radio channels has often been restricted by the frequencies and licenses available to go with them. However, while digital radio offers the opportunity to expand the number of radio stations, Scott also cautions that the transition from am/fm to digital should be carefully managed.
Radio NZ recently reported that thousands of people living in the Solomon Islands lost access to radio at the end of January when the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) switched off its AM signal, in favour of FM and online services.
Ruth Liloqula, told Radio NZ that after a recent earthquake some people living in remote parts of the Solomon Islands only knew that there was no tsunami because they heard it on ABC radio.
(Lyndal Rowlands is the United Nations Bureau Chief at IPS – Inter Press Service. Before becoming a UN correspondent in 2014 she worked as a researcher, writer and evaluator in the international development sector. She lives in East Harlem via Dili, Timor-Leste and Melbourne, Australia).
