Nahar Khan :
Very few people showed up to vote last week at a controversial reelection boycotted by the main opposition, causing a deep divide and ethnic cleavages throughout the East African nation.
The picture at polling stations retains a stark contrast to that of August 8, with polling booths standing empty and security forces outnumbering voters.
At the Mbajo Primary School polling station of Kakamega County, Samson Musungu, who defied the current political climate to show up told UNB, “Last time there were 1400 voters as the queue ran beyond the gates of this school and today, there were only 2.”
The opposition party National Super Alliance (NASA), led by Raila Odinga, has decided not to participate in the re-elections and announced that it is now a resistance movement focusing on defending democracy and mobilizing movements to ensure free and fair elections for the economic hub of East Africa.
Kakamega County appears to be a NASA stronghold as polling stations remained empty with people responding to its boycott. Festos Wasike, when asked why he didn’t vote this time, responds, “We are aware that the inevitable outcome of this re-election will be yet another Kenyatta victory.”
A historic Supreme Court ruling invalidated incumbent Uhuru Kenyatta’s victory in the August 8 elections, linking widespread irregularities in electronic transmission of election results and the murder of Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission’s (IEBC) Manager of IT, Chris Msando – who had developed a fraud-proof electronic ballot and voter registration system.
The monumental court ruling set a new precedent in the region due to government usually having substantial influence on the judges, as re-election threatens to drive risks of increased political unrest.
After the 2007 election violence, Kenya’s judiciary was said to have undergone extensive changes in order to restore conviction in the legal system.
However, having withdrawn from the re-run, the opposition leader Raila Odinga has refused to participate as re-elections are being held with little to no reforms in order to prevent electoral fraud.
Ethnically charged election violence
Certain reforms in the Constitution were introduced in 2010, in hopes to prevent outbreaks of violence, however ethnic divisions within Kenya continue to deepen and affect electoral processes.
“This election (8 August 2017) failed in exactly the same way as the previous election,” said George Kegoro, the head of the Kenyan Human Rights Commission as the country continues to be mired in political instability.
Kenya’s ethnically divided politics has deep roots, as seen during the 2007 presidential elections where Mwai Kibaki of the Kikuyu ethnic group was declared victorious against the Kalenjins and Luos, who believed their leader Raila Odinga had been cheated.
Irrespective of opposition’s boycott, much of the same can be seen today as Raila supporters are being elbowed out. Some areas, however, are witnessing continued tribal clashes as they take to the streets of Kenya.
Re-elections must go on
Even with Raila’s withdrawal from the re-run, elections have continued. The constitution requires the Election Commission to arrange the reelection by November 1. If they failed, short of a SUpreme Court ruling, the country would be plunged into a constitutional crisis.
Against this backdrop, the lack of a quorum at the Supreme Court for the hearing to go ahead in a suit filed seeking the reelection’s postponement on October 25, was no accident.
After the Deputy Chief Justice, Philomena Mwilu’s bodyguard was shot and killed, the court was unable to convene enough judges.
The European Union also announced on Tuesday that it would be reducing its size of observers due to safety concerns within the country, where in a recent statement, the diplomats stated this is an important time where “Kenya is at risk of losing much of what it has gained since 2008 unless it comes together at this crucial moment to preserve democracy and fundamental freedoms.”
For the first time in the history of African democracy, the Supreme Court had ruled election results invalid in an attempt to strengthen democratic gains. At a time when fair governance is diminishing in parts of the region, Kenya’s elections could have set a tone for the rest of the continent.
(Nahar Khan is a working journalist in a local news agency)
