High Court Division :(Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction)Farah Mahbub JMahmudul Hoque JShahidul Islam (Md)…..Accused-Petitioner in all the casesvsState and another………Opposite-Parties in all the casesJudgmentFebruary 5th, 2018Code of Criminal Procedure (V of 1893)Section 561A In an appropriate case, if on the face of the document which are beyond suspicion of doubt, placed by accused and not disputed by the prosecution the accusation against him cannot stand, for, it would be travesty of justice, if the accused is relegated to trial and he is...
High Court Division :(Special Original Jurisdiction) Md. Habibul Gani JMd. Akram Hossain Chowdhury JBirisiri Division of Garo Baptist Convention Bangladesh represented by its Secretary, Pastor Bimol Sangma……………….. PetitionerVSRegistrar, Joint Stock Companies and Firms and others———–RespondentsJudgment May 18th 2015Constitution of Bangladesh, 1972 Article 102 (2)Garo Baptist Convention of Bangladesh is a private organization registered with the office of the Registrar, Joint Stock Companies and Firms and mere registration does not state that the organization is running business with the affairs of...
High Court Division(Civil Revisional Jurisdiction) Khizir Ahmed Choudhury JLablu Ansar (Md). ……..Petitioner vs Md Salim Uddin and others ………………… Opposite-PartiesJudgment October 26th, 2017 Evidence Act (I of 1872) Section 90 Evidentiary value of old documents- The documents in question are as far back of 1966 which being old documents has evidentiary value and specially those documents has not been assailed by initiating any legal proceeding before the Court of law. …… (13) Code of Civil Procedure (V of 1908) Section...
(From previous issue)16. In the instant case although the petitioner claims to have filed a complaint to the administrative authority and thereafter to CPTU against the decision of the procuring authority to evaluate its technical proposal under Rule 56 of the Public Procurement Rules, 2008 in our opinion it is in fact an Appeal to the concerned authority against the rejection of Va Tech Wabag Limited’s bid. This view appears to be further evident from the fact that the Tender...
High Court Division :(Special Original Jurisdiction) Tariq ul Hakim J Md Faruque (M Faruque) J Va Tech Wabag Ltd………….…………Petitioner in WP No. 13490 of 2017vsDhaka Water Supply and Sewerage Authority (DWASA), represented by its Managing Director. WASA Bhaban, Dhaka and others RespondentsJudgment February 27th, 2018 Public Procurement Act (XXIV of 2006)Section 29(1)A person suffering or is likely to suffer loss or damage due to failure of a procuring entity to fulfill its obligations under this Act, to complain against that...
?????????????? ???????? ??????????? ???????? ???????? ??????????????, ???? ?(???????.?????.???.??) ?????? ??-??.??.????.???.??.???.??-??? ?????? ?? ?????, ????, ? ??, ???? ?????????? ???????????? ?????-????? ?????? ?????-????? ????????? ?????? ? ????? ? ?????? ?? ?????? ?????? ??.??.???.???.??.???.??-??? ????? ? ?? ????????, ?????????????????? ???? ? ??????? ???????? ????????????? ?????? ??”?? ??, ???? ??????? ?????? ??????? ?? ?-?-???? ??? ?-?-???? ??????? ???????? ???????????? ?????-????? ?????? ?????-????? ????????? ??????? ??? ????? ? ??????? ????????? ????¯’? ??????? ???? ?????? ??? ??? ????????? ? ? ? ????????? ??? “?” ???...
High Court Division :(Special Original Jurisdiction) Tariq ul Hakim J Md Faruque (M Faruque) J Va Tech Wabag Ltd………….…………Petitioner in WP No. 13490 of 2017vsDhaka Water Supply and Sewerage Authority (DWASA), represented by its Managing Director. WASA Bhaban, Dhaka and others RespondentsJudgment February 27th, 2018 Public Procurement Act (XXIV of 2006)Section 29(1)A person suffering or is likely to suffer loss or damage due to failure of a procuring entity to fulfill its obligations under this Act, to complain against that...
?????????????? ???????? ??????????? ???????? ???????? ??????????????, ???? ?(???????.?????.???.??) ?????? ??-??.??.????.???.??.???.??-??? ?????? ?? ?????, ????, ? ??, ???? ?????????? ???????????? ?????-????? ?????? ?????-????? ????????? ?????? ? ????? ? ?????? ?? ?????? ?????? ??.??.???.???.??.???.??-??? ????? ? ?? ????????, ?????????????????? ???? ? ??????? ???????? ????????????? ?????? ??”?? ??, ???? ??????? ?????? ??????? ?? ?-?-???? ??? ?-?-???? ??????? ???????? ???????????? ?????-????? ?????? ?????-????? ????????? ??????? ??? ????? ? ??????? ????????? ????¯’? ??????? ???? ?????? ??? ??? ????????? ? ? ? ????????? ??? “?” ???...
High Court Division :(Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction) Sheikh Abdul Awal J Bhishmadev Chakrabortty J Firozul Islam … Petitioner VsState and another……. ……… Opposite-Parties Judgment August 8th, 2018 Code of Criminal Procedure (V of 1898) Sections 439(4) and 561A Miscellaneous case under Section 561A of the Code is hit by Sub-Section (4) of Section 439 of the Code …….(12) Code of Criminal Procedure (V of 1898) Section 100 From a reading of the provisions of law, it is clear that the...
High Court Division :(Special Original Jurisdiction) Naima Haider J } Zafar Ahmed J } Sirajul Islam Siddiquy, (Md)………..Petitioner vs Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Liberation War Affair’s, Sarkari Paribahan Pool Bhaban, Secretariat Link Road, Dhaka and others …..Respondents.Judgment May 24th, 2018 Public Servant (Retirement) Act (XII of 1974) Section 4A The petitioner being a freedom fighter is entitled to get extension for one year and can work until he attains the age of 60 years. ……….. .in order to...
Appellate Division :(Civil) Mahmud Hossain CJMd Imman Ali JHasan Foez Siddique JMirza Hussain Haider JGovernment of Bangladesh and others……………….Petitioners(In CP Nos. 3520-3521- of 2017)vsMd Sohel Rana and others………Respondents In CP Nos. 3475 & 3520/17JudgmentApril 8th, 2018Constitution of Bangladesh, 1972 Article 102(2) Service matter-Seniority amongst officers appointed by the same process at different times, the date of entering service is relevant. A person who enters in the service first shall rank senior unless there is some rule providing otherwise. Since the...
High Court Division : (Civil Revisional Jurisdiction) Borhanuddin J } Renuka Rani Mondol} alias Roy…………Petitioner VS Judgment } Biswajit Mondol alias September 9th, 2015 } Roy and another ———-Opposite-Parties*Specific Relief Act (I of 1877) Section 42 Evidence Act (I of 1872) Section 114(e) It is settled that a suit for mere declaration without seeking cancellation of the document is not maintainable. Moreover, the deed of gift which is duly registered has a presumption of correctness as provided under Section 114(c) of...
