AFP, Washington :
Former special counsel Robert Mueller’s reticent testimony to Congress likely confirmed what many Democrats had feared: if they want to end Donald Trump’s presidency, their best bet is through next year’s election, not impeachment.
Mueller’s highly anticipated appearance Wednesday at back-to-back House hearings delivered neither the viral moments nor the bombshell soundbites that the anti-Trump crowd hoped would persuade skeptics or overwhelmingly reshape public opinion.
The contents of Mueller’s remarks were damning, several Democrats said, noting the former FBI director’s statements that the two-year investigation of Russian election interference was “not a witch hunt,” and indeed found substantial evidence of obstruction of justice.
But after Mueller’s flat one-word answers, seeming confusion about questions and refusal to produce new information, hopes that the performance would launch lawmakers on a path to impeachment had dimmed.
The 2020 election “is unquestionably the only way he gets removed from office, so we can never lose sight of that,” House Intelligence Committee chairman Adam Schiff, who presided over one of Mueller’s hearings, said Thursday.
Even Democrat Al Green, who forced an unsuccessful House vote on articles of impeachment last week following Trump’s racially charged attacks on four liberal congresswomen, acknowledged Mueller’s appearance fell short of expectations.
“There was no ‘aha’ moment because we’ve had the report and watched or discussed the President’s impeachable actions ad nauseum,” Green said on Twitter.
Ninety-five of the House’s 235 Democrats voted for Green’s measure. While pro-impeachment legislators were hoping dozens would shift to their position, just two more lawmakers publicly announced they now backed impeachment proceedings.
House Democrat Lisa Blunt Rochester said she supports impeachment after listening to Mueller declare that Trump stonewalled his investigation, failed to tell the truth in written answers to questions, and likely could have been charged with a crime without the Justice Department’s policy against indicting a sitting president. “Director Mueller has done his job. Now it’s time for Congress to do ours,” she said.
House Democrat Karen Bass, an impeachment skeptic, said the hearing “didn’t change me,” and that she wanted to proceed with ongoing House investigations.
“I also think that all of our leaders need to be on the same page,” she said.
·They aren’t. According to Politico, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, the top
Democrat in Congress, rebuffed an impeachment push by House Judiciary
Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler, telling a closed-door meeting after
Mueller’s testimony that it was premature.
For months, Pelosi has tamped down impeachment calls, aware of how dangerous such a vote would be for centrist Democrats in Republican-leaning districts.
She has argued that the case should be ironclad before lawmakers launch such a divisive process, especially given the likelihood it would die in the Republican-led Senate.
Former special counsel Robert Mueller’s reticent testimony to Congress likely confirmed what many Democrats had feared: if they want to end Donald Trump’s presidency, their best bet is through next year’s election, not impeachment.
Mueller’s highly anticipated appearance Wednesday at back-to-back House hearings delivered neither the viral moments nor the bombshell soundbites that the anti-Trump crowd hoped would persuade skeptics or overwhelmingly reshape public opinion.
The contents of Mueller’s remarks were damning, several Democrats said, noting the former FBI director’s statements that the two-year investigation of Russian election interference was “not a witch hunt,” and indeed found substantial evidence of obstruction of justice.
But after Mueller’s flat one-word answers, seeming confusion about questions and refusal to produce new information, hopes that the performance would launch lawmakers on a path to impeachment had dimmed.
The 2020 election “is unquestionably the only way he gets removed from office, so we can never lose sight of that,” House Intelligence Committee chairman Adam Schiff, who presided over one of Mueller’s hearings, said Thursday.
Even Democrat Al Green, who forced an unsuccessful House vote on articles of impeachment last week following Trump’s racially charged attacks on four liberal congresswomen, acknowledged Mueller’s appearance fell short of expectations.
“There was no ‘aha’ moment because we’ve had the report and watched or discussed the President’s impeachable actions ad nauseum,” Green said on Twitter.
Ninety-five of the House’s 235 Democrats voted for Green’s measure. While pro-impeachment legislators were hoping dozens would shift to their position, just two more lawmakers publicly announced they now backed impeachment proceedings.
House Democrat Lisa Blunt Rochester said she supports impeachment after listening to Mueller declare that Trump stonewalled his investigation, failed to tell the truth in written answers to questions, and likely could have been charged with a crime without the Justice Department’s policy against indicting a sitting president. “Director Mueller has done his job. Now it’s time for Congress to do ours,” she said.
House Democrat Karen Bass, an impeachment skeptic, said the hearing “didn’t change me,” and that she wanted to proceed with ongoing House investigations.
“I also think that all of our leaders need to be on the same page,” she said.
·They aren’t. According to Politico, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, the top
Democrat in Congress, rebuffed an impeachment push by House Judiciary
Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler, telling a closed-door meeting after
Mueller’s testimony that it was premature.
For months, Pelosi has tamped down impeachment calls, aware of how dangerous such a vote would be for centrist Democrats in Republican-leaning districts.
She has argued that the case should be ironclad before lawmakers launch such a divisive process, especially given the likelihood it would die in the Republican-led Senate.
